Jan 5, 2026
·
BASICS
·
Marketing Lead
Gamma is genuinely impressive for turning ideas into something visual. You add a prompt, document or notes and within minutes, you have content - formatted, organized, and ready to review. For brainstorming or internal docs, it's hard to beat that speed.
But the more I used Gamma, the more cracks started to show. I requested a standard 16:9 pitch deck and got slides that were square or tall, completely incompatible with PowerPoint. The exports didn't help either: text shifted, layouts broke, and I spent more time fixing than presenting.
Design-wise, Gamma delivered decent first drafts, but the output often felt more like a document than a deck - text-heavy slides, images that didn't always match the content, and layouts that looked like Notion-style blocks rather than polished presentation slides.
This makes sense once you realize Gamma is a multi-format tool built for documents, web pages, and slides using the same design system. Great for flexibility, but it's also why the output tends to feel more like a well-formatted doc than a professional presentation.
It was these limitations that pushed me to look for Gamma alternatives.
If you're exploring AI presentation makers for the first time, this comparison will help you understand which tool aligns best with your needs.
What is Gamma?
Gamma is an AI-powered design tool that generates slides, documents, and webpages. Launched in 2022, Gamma quickly gained popularity as an AI tool that could create entire presentations in seconds using prompts, notes, files or URL.
How to Make Presentations on Gamma
Creating a presentation on Gamma follows these steps:
Sign up at gamma.app - Create a free account to access the AI generator
Click "Generate" - Select whether you want a presentation, document, or webpage
Enter your content - Add your content as a prompt, notes, document or URL
Choose a theme - Gamma offers several visual themes
Wait for generation - Gamma creates slides in 30-60 seconds
Make edits - Adjust the slides as needed
Export - Download as PPTX or PDF or share as a link
What Does a Gamma Presentation Look Like?
A typical Gamma presentation has a distinct visual style:
Consistent colour theming: Gamma automatically applies a unified colour palette across all slides, including AI-generated images. This keeps decks visually cohesive without manual styling.
Card-based layouts: Content is organized into modular blocks that stack vertically, similar to Notion or a well-structured blog post. Clean and scannable, but can sometimes feel more like a document than a slide.
Varied content formats: The AI pulls from different layout types - timelines, icon grids, image galleries, bullet lists to keep slides from feeling repetitive.
Scrollable, web-native format: Gamma presentations are designed to be viewed in-browser, so slides often extend beyond traditional 16:9 dimensions. Great for online sharing, but problematic when you need a standard PowerPoint deck.
What Gamma Does Well
Speed: Gamma generates a full deck within minutes. For last-minute presentations or quick brainstorms, this alone makes it worth trying.
Consistent theming: Once you pick a theme, Gamma applies it across every slide, backgrounds, text, icons, and even AI-generated images. You don't have to worry about mismatched colours or manually adjusting each element to stay on-brand.
Format variety: The AI doesn't just dump bullet points on every slide. It pulls from different layout types - timelines for processes, icon grids for features, image galleries for visual content, comparison cards for options. This keeps decks from feeling like a wall of text.
Low barrier to entry: You don't need design skills or hours of PowerPoint experience to get started. Type a prompt, choose a theme, and Gamma handles the structure, layout, and styling. For anyone who's stared at a blank slide wondering where to begin, that's a genuine time-saver.
Good for iteration: Gamma works well as a first-draft tool. Even if the output isn't presentation-ready, it gives you a foundation to build on, an outline, a visual direction, and content you can refine rather than creating everything from zero.
Where Gamma Falls Short
That said, I ran into several issues that would need fixing before presenting:
Document-styled layouts: Since Gamma is a multi-format tool, it seems to use the same design principles across formats. This can often to lead to slides that are - too text-heavy, don’t maintain the usual 16:9 dimensions and break when exported to PowerPoint.
Hit-or-miss AI images: Some AI-generated visuals didn't quite fit the content, and a few looked slightly off or unnatural.
Unpredictable AI edits: Gamma's chat-based editing is hit or miss. Ask it to tweak a headline and it might rewrite the whole slide, layout, images, and all. There's no precise control, so small refinements often turn into full regenerations.
Design discrepancies: Although Gamma is able to give a decent output most of the time, I started noticing design discrepancies once I started creating more complex decks -
The Bottom Line on Gamma's Output
Gamma is a good introduction to AI-powered presentations, and for quick drafts or internal use, it delivers. But to get polished, client-ready results, you'll need to invest time learning the app's quirks and manually refining the output, which can eat into the time you saved by using AI in the first place.
Gamma Pricing
Understanding Gamma pricing is essential before committing:
Free tier: 400 credits (approximately 10 presentations)
Plus: $10/month – unlimited AI generations
Pro: $20/month – advanced features, custom fonts, analytics
Now that we’ve covered Gamma’s pro and cons, let’s look at the alternatives you should consider and why.
How We Tested These Gamma Alternatives
Our Testing Criteria
Design quality: Does the output look professionally designed or obviously AI-generated? Can you present it to clients without embarrassment?
Speed to final draft: How long from prompt to presentation-ready? This includes regenerations, manual fixes, and export troubleshooting.
Export reliability: Does the PowerPoint/PDF export match what you see in the editor? Or do you spend 30 minutes fixing broken layouts?
AI consistency: Does the AI understand context across slides, or does each edit feel like starting over?
Layout flexibility: Can you customize output, or are you locked into whatever the AI decides?
Quick Summary: Best Gamma Alternatives at a Glance
Alai – Best for design & speed (4 layout options, context-aware AI, Nano Banana Pro integration)
Plus AI – Best for Google Slides users (native integration, no export issues)
Beautiful.ai – Best for templated design (vast template library, brand kit)
Canva – Best for template variety (thousands of templates, all-in-one design platform)
Pitch – Best for sales teams (presentation analytics, video recording, CRM integrations)
Prezi – Best for non-linear presentations (zoomable canvas, unique storytelling format)
SlidesAI – Best budget option ($10/month, Google Slides native)
PowerPoint Copilot – Best for Microsoft 365 users (native PowerPoint, Word-to-deck conversion)
Gemini Canvas – Best for Google Workspace integration (included with Workspace, cross-app intelligence)
Chronicle – Best for storytelling & interactive presentations (narrative structure, smart canvas, interactive widgets)
1. Alai – Best For Design & Speed
After my frustrations with Gamma, Alai was one of the first tools that actually felt like an upgrade rather than a lateral move. Its presentation-specific design, context-aware AI and features like 4 layouts per slide made it much easier to create the final draft.
Features
Professionally designed output: Alai’s slides follow modern design principles - gradients, shadows, blurs, layered elements - these create visual depth that Gamma's flat blocks can't match.
Presentation-specific elements: Elements like Compare Two, Feature Matrix, Funnel diagrams, Timelines, make it super easy to create weekly data reports fast. The convert feature (switch elements in a click) helped me test different charts/graphs to see what fits my data the best.
4 layout options per slide: Every prompt generates four distinct design variations. Instead of hoping the first single output works, you choose an option that is closest to your final vision. This feature helped me save a bunch of AI credits on regenerations.
Context-aware AI: Alai's AI keeps context of your full deck, so edits stay consistent with your theme, content, and design. When I asked it to adjust slide 8, it didn't forget what I'd established in slides 1-7.
AI-generated visuals that actually fit: Leading AI models create editable images, charts, and diagrams that match your content. Gamma's AI images often felt random; Alai's feel intentional.
Responsive canvas: Spacing and alignment stay balanced as you add or remove content. No more manually nudging elements after every edit.
Multiple input formats: Turn notes, URLs, screenshots, PDFs, and existing PPTs into presentations. One of my favourite feature is beautifying existing decks using Alai.
Clean exports: PDF and PowerPoint exports that don't break your design. After Gamma's formatting disasters, this felt like a revelation.
Engagement tracking: Shareable links let you monitor views, engagement time, and drop-off points. Useful for decks where you want to know which slides resonate.
API access: For teams that need to generate on-brand decks at scale, Alai offers programmatic access making it easy to build saleable automations
Nano Banana Pro integration: As a non-designer, this was my personal favourite. Alai allows you to use Nano Banana pro to create editable (theme-consistent) slides either at the time of generation (included in the 4 layout options given) or beautify existing slides using specific design pre-sets (you can easily mix both normal slides and Nano Banana Pro ones, something that Gamma’s studio feature does not allow)
Learn how to use Nano Banana Pro to create presentations →
Pros
Design quality is noticeably better than Gamma. Slides look professionally designed without manual tweaking, modern aesthetics, balanced layouts, sophisticated colour usage.
The 4-layout system saves real time and money. I stopped regenerating slides hoping for something better. Four options means one of them almost always works or is close to what I want. No credits wasted on repeated regenerations.
Context-aware AI prevents inconsistency. Edits on slide 10 don't accidentally clash with the style established on slide 2. Gamma's isolated slide generation can't do this.
Exports actually work. Dozens of PowerPoint exports, zero formatting disasters. Text stays put, layouts hold, files open cleanly.
AI image generations that make sense. Alai’s AI is trained to generate images while keeping context of the slide, this helps ensure images are not random, saving time and effort
Nano Banana Pro presets for instant polish. Alai's Nano Banana Pro integration creates visually striking slides that automatically match your deck's theme. The pre-sets give you options tailored to different needs, and you can mix standard slides with Nano Banana Pro slides so key moments like title cards, section breaks, or big announcements get the extra visual impact they deserve.
Engagement tracking built in. Share a link and see who viewed your deck, which slides they spent time on, and where they dropped off. For sales decks or investor pitches, knowing what resonates is invaluable.
API access for scale. Need to generate dozens of on-brand decks programmatically? Alai's API lets you build presentations at scale, useful for teams producing recurring reports, personalized sales decks, or templated client deliverables.
Cons
Smaller free credit allocation (200 vs Gamma's 400). But since you're not burning credits on regenerations, the effective value is similar or better.
Usage is limited to presentations. Unlike Gamma, Alia is only made for presentations and does not support multiple formats.
Pricing
Free: 200 credits to explore the platform
Plus: $16/month – unlimited presentations, premium templates
Pro: $25/month – advanced features, priority support, team collaboration
Why Choose Alai Over Gamma
If you're using Gamma for quick internal drafts or brainstorming, it does the job. But if your presentations actually matter - client pitches, investor decks, board meetings, Alai is the better tool.
The design quality alone justifies the switch: Gamma's flat blocks look like formatted documents, while Alai's output looks like a designer made it. The 4-layout system means you stop wasting time and credits on regenerations hoping for something usable. The context-aware AI means you’re not wasting time making edits manually. And the exports actually work. Nano Banana Pro ensures visual quality that most other ai presentation makers are unable to create. All in all, Alai wins the competition in terms of design and speed.
2. Plus AI – Best for Google Slides Users
I tested Plus AI for our sales team that was deep in Google Slides for their pitches. The appeal is obvious: instead of generating in Gamma, exporting, importing to Google, and watching formatting break at every step, Plus AI just works inside Slides from the start.
Features
Native Google Slides integration: Plus AI runs as an add-on directly inside Google Slides. No platform switching, no exports, no formatting roulette. You generate, edit, and collaborate all in one place.
AI slide generation: The core functionality is similar to Gamma—describe what you want and the AI builds slides. The output quality is decent, though less polished than Alai.
Content remixing: You can take existing slides and have the AI restructure or rewrite them. This is useful for repurposing old decks, something Gamma doesn't handle well.
PDF and document import: Drop in a PDF or doc, and Plus AI will attempt to convert it into slides. Hit or miss depending on the source formatting, but useful when it works.
Pros
The Google Slides integration is seamless. If your team lives in Google Workspace, this removes a lot of friction.
No export headaches, what you see is what you get, and it's already in Slides.
Collaboration is native. Multiple people can work on AI-generated slides in real-time.
Familiar interface means almost no learning curve for existing Slides users.
Cons
You're locked into Google's ecosystem. No PowerPoint support, no standalone app.
Design options feel more limited than Gamma or Alai. The slides are functional but rarely impressive.
Like Gamma, you still only get one layout option per generation, no choice, just output.
Pricing is higher than Gamma for what feels like fewer features.
Pricing
Free: Limited features
Pro: $15/month
Team: $25/user/month
Why Choose Plus AI Over Gamma
Choose Plus AI if your team is embedded in Google Workspace and you want AI generation without leaving Slides. It eliminates the export problems that plague Gamma and keeps everything in a familiar interface. But if design quality matters, Alai is still the better choice, Plus AI trades polish for convenience.
3. Beautiful AI – Best for Templated Design
I used Beautiful AI for a couple of months before Gamma came along. Their template library is vast giving you multiple themes to play around with but when compared to Gamma the AI is non-existent and designs feel out-dated.
Features
Huge template library: Beautiful AI has a vast library of templates to choose from which allows you to play around with multiple layouts.
Design AI: Their AI can generate slides from prompts, similar to Gamma. The output is polished but follows Beautiful AI’s design constraints, so there's less variation.
Brand kit: Upload your fonts, colours, and logo, and Beautiful.ai applies them consistently across all presentations. More robust than Gamma's theming options.
Presentation analytics: Track who viewed your deck and which slides they spent time on. Useful for sales teams, though not as detailed as Pitch.
Pros
Excellent for non-designers who want polish without learning design principles.
Brand kit keeps company presentations consistent across teams.
Vast template library allows you to experiment with different design themes, especially if you’re someone still figuring out your brand.
Cons
The smart templates can feel restrictive. Sometimes you want to break the grid, and Beautiful AI fights you.
Less flexibility than Gamma, far less than Alai. You're working within their system, not creating freely.
AI generation is less sophisticated than dedicated tools; it's really a template tool with AI bolted on.
Pricing jumps significantly for team features—$40/user/month is steep.
Pricing
Pro: $12/month (annual billing)
Team: $40/user/month
Why Choose Beautiful AI Over Gamma
Choose Beautiful AI if brand and design consistency is the most important aspect of your presentation and you have a dedicated resource that can use Beautiful AI to ensure the same. If you’re looking for a presentation maker that uses AI to make your work faster, you’re better off using Gamma or its other alternatives.
4. Canva - Best for Template Variety
As a marketer, I’ve used Canva for years, social graphics, one-pagers, quick designs. Testing it for presentations felt natural, though it's a different workflow than Gamma. Less "AI generates everything" and more "pick a template, customize with AI assistance."
Features
Massive template library: Canva's presentation templates number in the thousands. Whatever style you're imagining, there's probably a template for it. This dwarfs Gamma's limited theme selection.
Magic Studio AI: Canva's AI suite includes text generation, image creation, and design suggestions. It's newer and less presentation-focused than Gamma, but improving rapidly.
Brand kit: Upload your brand assets and Canva applies them across designs. Works well for teams that need consistency across presentations and other marketing materials.
Multi-format exports: PDF, PPTX, video, image—Canva exports reliably to almost anything. I've never had a Canva export break the way Gamma exports do.
Stock media library: Millions of photos, videos, graphics, and icons included. No hunting for external assets.
Pros
Template variety is unmatched. If you know the look you want, Canva probably has it.
The free tier is genuinely useful, more generous than Gamma's credit system.
Exports are reliable. PowerPoint files open correctly every time.
All-in-one platform means you can create presentations alongside social posts, documents, and other collateral.
Cons
Not presentation-first. Canva is a general design tool, and the AI features reflect that, less sophisticated for slides specifically.
Can feel overwhelming. The sheer number of options leads to decision paralysis.
AI generation isn't as seamless as Gamma or Alai. It's better for "enhance this template" than "build from scratch."
No multiple layout options, you pick a template and customize, rather than AI generating variations.
Pricing
Free: Generous free tier with basic features
Pro: $15/month
Teams: $10/user/month (minimum 3 users)
Why Choose Canva Over Gamma
Choose Canva if you want massive template variety and need presentations alongside other design work. The exports are more reliable than Gamma, and the free tier offers more value. But if you want AI to generate presentations from scratch rather than customizing templates Gamma or Alai are better fits.
5. Pitch – Best for Sales Teams
I tested Pitch with the primary focus of finding something our sales team can also use for async pitches, analytics and collaboration with marketing.
Features
Presentation analytics: See who opened your deck, which slides they viewed, and how long they spent on each. This data is gold for sales follow-ups.
Video recording: Record yourself presenting over slides for async pitches. You can send a personalized walkthrough without scheduling a meeting.
CRM integrations: Connect with Salesforce, HubSpot, and other CRMs. Presentation engagement data flows directly into your sales pipeline.
AI slide generation: Pitch offers AI-powered slide creation similar to Gamma. Quality is solid, though not as design-focused as Alai.
Real-time collaboration: Multiple team members can work on decks simultaneously with commenting and version history.
Pros
The analytics are genuinely actionable. We discovered prospects spent 80% of their time on 3 slides, so we optimized those.
Video recording is smooth and professional. Great for personalized outreach at scale.
CRM integration means presentation data doesn't live in a silo.
Modern, clean templates that look professional without much customization.
Cons
Overkill for non-sales use cases. If you just need a presentation, Pitch's features add complexity you won't use.
Learning curve is steeper than Gamma. The additional features require time to understand.
Pricing reflects the sales focus - $25/user/month is harder to justify for individuals.
AI generation is good but not great. Pitch's strength is what happens after you create the deck, not the creation itself.
Pricing
Free: Basic features
Pro: $25/member/month
Business: Custom pricing
Why Choose Pitch Over Gamma
Pitch is an ai presentation maker that’s made more for presenting and analytics than creating the presentation itself. While features like detailed analytics, video recordings and real-time collaboration make the tool super useful for any sales team, if creation is more important than the post-creation process, other ai presentation makers show better results.
6. Prezi – Best for Non-Linear Presentations
Prezi is the wildcard on this list. While every other tool creates slides, Prezi creates zoomable canvases, a completely different presentation format. I used it for a conference talk and got compliments on how different it felt.
Features
Zoomable canvas: Instead of linear slides, Prezi lets you create a visual map that zooms in and out of content. It's genuinely unique and memorable when done well.
Prezi Video: Overlay your presentation on your webcam feed for virtual meetings. Your slides appear beside or behind you as you present.
AI-assisted creation: Prezi has added AI features to help generate content, though it's not as developed as Gamma or Alai.
Reusable templates: Start from pre-built structures and customize. Templates range from business-focused to creative.
Offline mode: Present without internet access—useful for conferences with unreliable WiFi.
Pros
Presentations genuinely stand out. No one mistakes a Prezi for a PowerPoint.
The zooming format is excellent for storytelling and explaining complex relationships.
Prezi Video is innovative—having slides appear alongside you feels more personal than screen sharing.
Pricing is reasonable, especially the Standard tier at $7/month.
Cons
The zooming can cause motion discomfort for some viewers. I've seen people look queasy during Prezi presentations.
Steeper learning curve than slide-based tools. The spatial canvas takes time to master.
Not suitable for data-heavy presentations—the format works better for concepts than charts.
Doesn't export well to traditional formats. If someone wants a PDF or PPTX, you're stuck.
Pricing
Basic: Free (limited features)
Standard: $7/month
Plus: $12/month
Premium: $16/month
Why Choose Prezi Over Gamma
Choose Prezi if you want to break completely from the traditional slide format. It's memorable for storytelling, educational content, and creative presentations where Gamma's linear blocks would feel boring. But for standard business presentations or anything requiring PowerPoint export, stick with Alai or Gamma.
7. SlidesAI – Best Budget Option
SlidesAI is the no-frills option on this list. It does one thing, turns text into slides at the lowest price point. I tested it when looking for the cheapest viable Gamma alternative.
Features
Text-to-slide AI: Paste text or describe your topic, and SlidesAI generates a presentation. Core functionality matches Gamma, though less polished.
Google Slides integration: Runs as a Google Slides add-on, so output goes directly into Slides without export issues.
Topic-based generation: Enter just a topic and SlidesAI will research and generate content—useful for quick drafts on unfamiliar subjects.
Multi-language support: Generate presentations in various languages. Helpful for international teams.
Pros
Most affordable option on this list. The $10/month tier matches Gamma's pricing with Google-native output.
The free tier is predictable, 3 presentations per month instead of Gamma's credit system that burns faster than expected.
Google Slides integration means no export headaches. What you generate is what you get.
Simple interface with almost no learning curve.
Cons
Design quality is noticeably lower than Gamma or Alai. Slides are functional, not impressive.
Limited customization options. You're working with basic layouts and minimal styling control.
Like Gamma, you get one output per generation—no layout choices.
Feature set is thin compared to competitors. It's truly a "you get what you pay for" situation.
Pricing
Free: 3 presentations/month
Basic: $10/month
Pro: $20/month
Why Choose SlidesAI Over Gamma
Choose SlidesAI if budget is your primary concern and you work in Google Slides. It matches Gamma's price with the added benefit of Google-native output—no export issues. But if design quality matters for your use case, Alai is worth the extra cost. SlidesAI is the Honda Civic of AI presentation tools: reliable, affordable, nothing fancy.
8. Microsoft Copilot – Best for Microsoft 365 Users
For teams embedded in Microsoft 365, Copilot brings Gamma-style AI directly into PowerPoint. No exports, no new tools to learn just AI generation inside the app you're already using.
Features
Native PowerPoint integration: Copilot runs inside PowerPoint, so generated slides are native .pptx from the start. No conversion, no formatting breaks.
Word document conversion: Paste a Word doc or outline, and Copilot transforms it into a presentation. This worked impressively well in my testing—our quarterly report became a slide deck in seconds.
Design suggestions: Copilot can analyze slides and suggest improvements—better layouts, clearer visuals, more concise text.
Presentation summarization: Drop in a long deck and Copilot will create an executive summary version. Useful for condensing detailed presentations.
Enterprise compliance: For organizations with strict data policies, Copilot operates within Microsoft's security framework.
Pros
Zero export issues. You're working in PowerPoint natively, so what you create is what you present.
Word-to-PowerPoint conversion is genuinely useful. Turning documents into decks is faster than any other tool I tested.
No new interface to learn. If you know PowerPoint, you know where everything is.
Enterprise-grade security satisfies IT departments that would reject cloud-based tools.
Cons
Expensive. You need Microsoft 365 plus a Copilot license - $20/month on top of your existing subscription.
AI capabilities are still maturing. Copilot's generation isn't as sophisticated as dedicated tools like Alai.
Only makes sense if you're already in the Microsoft ecosystem. As a standalone purchase, the cost is hard to justify.
Limited to PowerPoint's design capabilities—no advanced layouts like Alai's Feature Matrix or Compare Two elements.
Pricing
Copilot Pro: $20/month (requires Microsoft 365 subscription)
Copilot for Microsoft 365 Business: $30/user/month
Why Choose Microsoft Copilot Over Gamma
Choose Copilot if you're already paying for Microsoft 365 and want AI assistance without leaving PowerPoint. It eliminates the export problems that plague Gamma and keeps everything in a familiar environment. But if you're not locked into Microsoft, Alai offers better AI generation at a lower total cost.
Is Microsoft Copilot good for creating presentations?
9. Gemini Canvas – Best for Google Workspace Integration
Google's Gemini is the newest entrant on this list, bringing AI presentation capabilities to Google Workspace users. It's not as mature as Gamma yet, but for teams already paying for Workspace, it's effectively free.
Features
Google Workspace integration: Gemini works across Docs, Sheets, and Slides. You can generate a presentation outline in Docs and convert it to Slides seamlessly.
AI slide generation: Describe what you want and Gemini creates slides inside Google Slides. Quality is improving rapidly with each update.
Image generation: Gemini can create custom images for your slides—helpful for unique visuals without stock photo hunting.
Cross-app intelligence: Because Gemini accesses your Workspace content, it can pull relevant information from your Drive when generating presentations.
Pros
Included with Google Workspace subscriptions—no additional cost for something that rivals Gamma's core features.
Deep integration across Google apps creates a seamless workflow.
Google is iterating fast. What feels basic today may be competitive with dedicated tools within a year.
No export issues since you're working in native Google Slides.
Cons
Still maturing. The AI quality isn't quite at Gamma's level yet, and well below Alai's.
Limited to Google Workspace—if you work in PowerPoint, this isn't for you.
Fewer templates and design options than dedicated presentation tools.
Customization and control options are basic compared to Alai's precision features.
Pricing
Business Starter: $7.20/user/month (includes Gemini)
Business Standard: $14.40/user/month
Why Choose Gemini Over Gamma
Choose Gemini if you already pay for Google Workspace and want AI presentation features without an additional subscription. It's "free" if you're already in the ecosystem, and it eliminates the export issues that Gamma creates when you need slides in Google. But if presentation quality matters, Alai remains the better dedicated option.
Is Gemini the best way to create presentations using AI?
10. Chronicle – Best for Storytelling and Interactive Presentations
Chronicle takes a different approach than most tools on this list. While Gamma and others focus on speed, Chronicle focuses on structure and engagement, helping you build presentations that actually tell a story rather than just display information.
Features
Storytelling structure: This is Chronicle's standout feature. It organizes content into logical sequences - hook, problem, solution, proof - rather than just generating slide after slide. Presentations feel like they're going somewhere, not just listing information.
Brand consistency: Upload your fonts, colours, and logos once, and Chronicle applies them automatically across all slides. More robust than Gamma's basic theming, everything stays on-brand without manual adjustments.
Interactive widgets: Motion-enabled elements like zoom effects, highlights, and animated transitions make presentations more engaging. Useful for presentations that need to hold attention, not just convey information.
Smart canvas: A flexible, freeform workspace where you can drag elements freely, then tidy them into clean layouts with one click. More creative freedom than Gamma's rigid blocks.
Real-time collaboration: Shared editing, comments, and live presentation mode for team projects. Multiple people can work on the same deck simultaneously.
Mobile-optimized output: Presentations are built to look good on any device—bite-sized, shareable formats that work on phones and tablets, not just laptop screens.
Keyboard-first workflow: Shortcuts for nearly everything, making slide building significantly faster once you learn them. Power users will appreciate this; Gamma doesn't offer the same level of keyboard control.
Pros
Storytelling structure is genuinely useful. The hook-problem-solution-proof framework helped me build a pitch deck that actually flowed logically. Gamma just generates slides; Chronicle helps you think through the narrative.
Interactive widgets add engagement. Zoom effects and highlights made my product demo presentation more dynamic than anything I'd built in Gamma or PowerPoint.
Smart canvas offers creative flexibility. Drag elements freely, experiment with layouts, then snap everything into alignment. It's the best of freeform and structured design.
Brand consistency saves time for teams. Set up your brand kit once and forget about it. Every presentation looks on-brand automatically.
Mobile-first output is increasingly relevant. More stakeholders are viewing decks on phones. Chronicle's mobile-optimized format means presentations don't fall apart on smaller screens.
Cons
Steeper learning curve than Gamma. The storytelling features and smart canvas take time to master. It's not as "type and generate" as Gamma.
Overkill for simple presentations. If you just need a quick internal update, Chronicle's structure-first approach adds complexity you don't need.
Smaller template library. Fewer starting points than Canva or even Gamma. You're expected to build more from scratch.
Less focus on pure AI generation. Chronicle's AI is good, but it's not the star of the show—storytelling and interactivity are. If you want the fastest AI output, Alai or Gamma are faster.
Pricing
Free: Limited features
Pro: $15/month
Team: Custom pricing
Why Choose Chronicle Over Gamma
Choose Chronicle if your presentations need to tell a story, not just display information. Gamma generates slides quickly but doesn't help you structure a narrative. Chronicle's storytelling framework—hook, problem, solution, proof—forces you to think about flow and audience engagement. The interactive widgets and smart canvas also make it better for presentations that need to hold attention: product demos, investor pitches, keynote talks. For quick internal drafts, Gamma is faster. For presentations where structure and engagement matter, Chronicle is worth the learning curve.
Frequently Asked Questions About Gamma Alternatives
Is Gamma free?
Gamma offers 400 free credits for new users, enough for approximately 10 presentations. After that, Gamma pricing kicks in at $10/month for Plus. For comparison, Alai offers 200 free credits, while SlidesAI provides 3 free presentations monthly (more predictable than Gamma's credit system).
What is Gamma used for?
Gamma is an AI tool that generates presentations, documents, and webpages from text prompts. People use Gamma for quick slide creation, presentations for meetings, and PowerPoint exports. However, Gamma's single-output limitation drives many to gamma alternatives like Alai.
I primarily used Gamma for first drafts and internal presentations - anything client-facing required too much manual clean-up.
Is Gamma better than PowerPoint?
Gamma and PowerPoint serve different purposes. Gamma generates slides automatically, while PowerPoint requires manual creation. However, Gamma exports to PowerPoint often lose formatting, making PowerPoint Copilot a better Gamma alternative for Microsoft users.
I've had Gamma exports break so badly that I gave up and rebuilt slides manually in PowerPoint. That experience is what led me to test alternatives.
Which Gamma alternative is best for pitch decks?
Alai is the best gamma alternative for pitch decks. Unlike Gamma's single output, Alai provides 4 layout options per slide. It also offers presentation-specific elements (Feature Matrix, Compare Two, Funnel) that Gamma lacks. See our pitch deck examples for what's possible beyond Gamma.
I've built three investor decks with Alai now, and each one looked distinctly different—impossible to achieve with Gamma's generic outputs.
Can I export Gamma presentations to PowerPoint?
Yes, Gamma offers PowerPoint export, but conversions often break formatting. This is a major Gamma limitation driving users to gamma alternatives. Alai offers cleaner PPTX exports, while tools like PowerPoint Copilot eliminate the export problem entirely by working natively in PowerPoint.
My advice: always open your Gamma export in PowerPoint before an important meeting. I learned this the hard way when text boxes shifted mid-presentation.
What is the best free alternative to Gamma?
For a free gamma alternative, Alai offers 200 credits to test its superior 4-layout system. Canva provides unlimited free templates (more than Gamma). SlidesAI gives 3 free presentations monthly. Each beats Gamma's free tier in different ways—Alai for quality, Canva for variety, SlidesAI for predictability.
How does Gamma compare to Canva?
Gamma focuses on AI presentation generation, AI creates slides from prompts. Canva offers templates you customize plus Magic Studio AI. Gamma is faster for generation; Canva offers more variety. Neither matches Alai's 4-layout approach that combines Gamma's speed with design options.
I use Canva when I want a specific look from their template library. I use Alai when I want AI to generate something original with options to choose from.
Final Verdict: Which Gamma Alternative Should You Choose?
After testing every major gamma alternative over the past three months, here's my honest recommendation:
For better design and speed: Choose Alai for 4 layout options (vs Gamma's 1), context-aware AI, and premium design that Gamma can't match
For Google Slides users: Plus AI or SlidesAI for native integration without switching to Gamma
For sales teams: Pitch for analytics Gamma lacks
For budget-conscious users: SlidesAI matches Gamma pricing with Google integration
For data presentations: Chronicle for live data Gamma can't handle
The bottom line: Gamma is good for quick drafts, but gamma alternatives have surpassed it for professional use. If you've felt limited by Gamma only giving you one design option, frustrated by export issues, or experienced the "every deck looks the same" problem, the alternatives deliver what Gamma promised but never quite achieved.
Whether you're looking for the best AI pitch deck generator or simply a better AI presentation tool, you now have options that Gamma can't match.
Ready to upgrade from Gamma? Start free with Alai and experience 4 layout options per slide, context-aware AI, and the design control that Gamma never offered.
Related Reading
PAGES
Compare Tools
resources